<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>orchestrator Issue Tracker Rss Feed</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic</link><description>orchestrator Issue Tracker Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Unassigned: TFS IP - Check In error [19727]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19727</link><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have been using the TFS IP &amp;#40;Version 1.4 &amp;#41;in conjunction with SCSM and TFS for some time and find the IP is extremely useful, great work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have just started to test check out&amp;#47;in but have encountered and issue with the check in activity. the error related to the Comments field.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I enter a value for the comment field &amp;#40;my comment&amp;#41; I get the following error&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;_Requested value &amp;#39;my comment&amp;#39; was not found._   &amp;#40;full error attached&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I leave the comment field empty I get the following error&amp;#58; Must specify valid information for parsing in the string.&lt;br /&gt;which is expected as the field is a required field.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All other TFS IP activities work fine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>NojNoj33</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:09:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Unassigned: TFS IP - Check In error [19727] 20130517030947P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Error from webservice is outputtet via Write-Host [19606]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19606</link><description>If you try to run a runbook that does not exist etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the error is outputtet through Write-Host&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This makes it very hard to catch the error message from the webservice.&lt;br /&gt;To make this work together with my internal SCSM workflows, that triggers runbooks, i have changed the module.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i also experienced that it tried to close the &amp;#36;response in the finally block without checking if it was null. this caused that error to be displayed instead of the real web service error.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the catch&amp;#47;finally now looks like this&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt; catch &amp;#91;System.Net.WebException&amp;#93;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#61;  &amp;#34;Exception occurred in &amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;MyInvocation.MyCommand&amp;#41;&amp;#58; &amp;#96;n&amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;_.Exception.Message&amp;#41;&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#43;&amp;#61;  &amp;#34;Response &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;response &amp;#61; &amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;_.Exception.Response&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#35; Show the response with the error information&lt;br /&gt;        if &amp;#40;&amp;#36;response.ContentLength -gt 0&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader &amp;#61; &amp;#91;IO.StreamReader&amp;#93; &amp;#36;response.GetResponseStream&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;reader.ReadToEnd&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#43;&amp;#61; &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;           &amp;#35;Write-Host &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;response &amp;#61; &amp;#36;null&lt;br /&gt;        throw &amp;#36;errmsg&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;    finally&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;null&lt;br /&gt;        if &amp;#40;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;response -ne &amp;#36;null&amp;#41; -and &amp;#40;&amp;#36;response.ContentLength -gt 0&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader &amp;#61; &amp;#91;IO.StreamReader&amp;#93; &amp;#36;response.GetResponseStream&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;reader.ReadToEnd&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#91;xml&amp;#93;&amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;       if&amp;#40;&amp;#36;response -ne &amp;#36;null&amp;#41; &amp;#123; &amp;#36;response.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41; &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;        &lt;br /&gt;        Write-Output &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you have any comments about why it is sent to write-host, or how to get the error message&amp;#63; &amp;#40;maybe i overlooked the method you are using&amp;#41;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P.s. if you want, i would love to join this project and help out fixing bugs and improving the module. &amp;#40;I have 6 years of powershell and 2 years of Orchestrator trainer and consultant experience&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: JGS ** &lt;p&gt;(i am now sure yet if this quickfix i did today is best practice. but i tried to change as little as possible)&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>JGS</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:35:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Error from webservice is outputtet via Write-Host [19606] 20130417083515A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Error from webservice is outputtet via Write-Host [19606]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19606</link><description>If you try to run a runbook that does not exist etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the error is outputtet through Write-Host&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This makes it very hard to catch the error message from the webservice.&lt;br /&gt;To make this work together with my internal SCSM workflows, that triggers runbooks, i have changed the module.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i also experienced that it tried to close the &amp;#36;response in the finally block without checking if it was null. this caused that error to be displayed instead of the real web service error.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the catch&amp;#47;finally now looks like this&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt; catch &amp;#91;System.Net.WebException&amp;#93;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#61;  &amp;#34;Exception occurred in &amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;MyInvocation.MyCommand&amp;#41;&amp;#58; &amp;#96;n&amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;_.Exception.Message&amp;#41;&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#43;&amp;#61;  &amp;#34;Response &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;response &amp;#61; &amp;#36;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;_.Exception.Response&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#35; Show the response with the error information&lt;br /&gt;        if &amp;#40;&amp;#36;response.ContentLength -gt 0&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader &amp;#61; &amp;#91;IO.StreamReader&amp;#93; &amp;#36;response.GetResponseStream&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;reader.ReadToEnd&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;errmsg &amp;#43;&amp;#61; &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;           &amp;#35;Write-Host &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;response &amp;#61; &amp;#36;null&lt;br /&gt;        throw &amp;#36;errmsg&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;    finally&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;null&lt;br /&gt;        if &amp;#40;&amp;#40;&amp;#36;response -ne &amp;#36;null&amp;#41; -and &amp;#40;&amp;#36;response.ContentLength -gt 0&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader &amp;#61; &amp;#91;IO.StreamReader&amp;#93; &amp;#36;response.GetResponseStream&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;reader.ReadToEnd&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#91;xml&amp;#93;&amp;#36;output &amp;#61; &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#36;reader.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;       if&amp;#40;&amp;#36;response -ne &amp;#36;null&amp;#41; &amp;#123; &amp;#36;response.Close&amp;#40;&amp;#41; &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;        &lt;br /&gt;        Write-Output &amp;#36;output&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you have any comments about why it is sent to write-host, or how to get the error message&amp;#63; &amp;#40;maybe i overlooked the method you are using&amp;#41;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P.s. if you want, i would love to join this project and help out fixing bugs and improving the module. &amp;#40;I have 6 years of powershell and 2 years of Orchestrator trainer and consultant experience&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>JGS</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:33:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Error from webservice is outputtet via Write-Host [19606] 20130417083351A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: SCCM 2012 SP1 IP List [19456]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19456</link><description>I registered the SCCM 2012 SP1 IP with my SCO 2012 SP1 Designer. I set up the connection to my Site Server which appears to work correctly but when i use the Get Collection Members activity, none of my collections are populating in the Item Selection list.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Am I doing something incorrectly&amp;#63; Any help is appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: billyccfs ** &lt;p&gt;I figured it out. I was using the service account used by both SCCM and SCO to make the connection. Unfortunately, I hadn't added the service account to Administrative Users (just assumed it had already been added during setup). Once I added it with Full Admin role, everything worked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>billyccfs</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: SCCM 2012 SP1 IP List [19456] 20130312013600P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: SCCM 2012 SP1 IP List [19456]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19456</link><description>I registered the SCCM 2012 SP1 IP with my SCO 2012 SP1 Designer. I set up the connection to my Site Server which appears to work correctly but when i use the Get Collection Members activity, none of my collections are populating in the Item Selection list.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Am I doing something incorrectly&amp;#63; Any help is appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>billyccfs</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: SCCM 2012 SP1 IP List [19456] 20130311033406P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: OrchestratorServiceModule.psm1 errors with powershell 3.0 [19023]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19023</link><description>Powershell 3.0 is throwing errors when you try and load this module because there are 2 places where the module is trying to return from a finally block. It doesn&amp;#39;t look like the module actually needs the finally blocks and they can basically be removed and leave the code that&amp;#39;s in them at the end of their respective functions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The functions are sendHttpGetRequest and sendHttpPostRequest.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Chris1000 ** &lt;p&gt;The module has been updated to address the PS 3.0 issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Chris1000</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:21:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: OrchestratorServiceModule.psm1 errors with powershell 3.0 [19023] 20130115102136P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: OrchestratorServiceModule.psm1 errors with powershell 3.0 [19023]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/19023</link><description>Powershell 3.0 is throwing errors when you try and load this module because there are 2 places where the module is trying to return from a finally block. It doesn&amp;#39;t look like the module actually needs the finally blocks and they can basically be removed and leave the code that&amp;#39;s in them at the end of their respective functions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The functions are sendHttpGetRequest and sendHttpPostRequest.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>rchiav</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:34:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: OrchestratorServiceModule.psm1 errors with powershell 3.0 [19023] 20121207033456P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: TFS 2010 IP - Support for ISA Server/Proxies [18887]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18887</link><description>There&amp;#39;s currently no support in the TFS 2010 Integration pack for proxying requests over ISA Server, or other authenticated proxy solutions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would be a valuable feature for implementations in highly secured environments.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>shdunk</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: TFS 2010 IP - Support for ISA Server/Proxies [18887] 20121108071600P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: IP Active Directory - GetGroup filter member issue if User DN contains coma [18835]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18835</link><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I try to check with MS Orchestrato IP Active Directory if a AD User is member of AD Group.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For that I create a Runbook. In this Runbook, there 3 actions.&lt;br /&gt;- &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get User&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59; in AD with filter Sam Account Name&lt;br /&gt;- &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get Group&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59; in AD with filters Sam Account Name equals &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;GROUPNAME&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59; and &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Inderect Member&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59; or &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Member&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59; equals &amp;#123;Distinguished Name  from &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get User&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;- Send mail with &amp;#123;Count from &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get Group&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the Common Name contains coma as &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;LASTName, FirstName&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;, the DN contains &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;LASTName&amp;#92;, FirstName&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;. In this case the &amp;#123;Count from &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get Group&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;&amp;#125; return 0 whereas user is in the target group. &lt;br /&gt;Example CN&amp;#58;  GATES, Bill&lt;br /&gt;Example DN&amp;#58; CN&amp;#61;GATES&amp;#92;, Bill,OU&amp;#61;Test,DC&amp;#61;MS,DC&amp;#61;NET&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you remove coma from CN, the &amp;#123;Count from &amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;Get Group&amp;#38;quot&amp;#59;&amp;#125; return 1 who is right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NB&amp;#58; In my office, we can&amp;#39;t change pattern of the CN.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bye.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>ClemPIDE</author><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:32:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: IP Active Directory - GetGroup filter member issue if User DN contains coma [18835] 20121031083212P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: TFS Integration Pack - Check In Object incorrect input mapping [18288]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18288</link><description>Hey Yao,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It looks like your check in object isn&amp;#39;t mapping quite correctly to your versioncontrolhelper class.  In the object you are doing &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;vcHelper.Checkin&amp;#40;workspacePath, localPath, comment, recursion&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;but the constructor is&lt;br /&gt;public void Checkin&amp;#40;&lt;br /&gt;            string workspacePath,&lt;br /&gt;            string localFilePath,&lt;br /&gt;            string recursion,&lt;br /&gt;            string comment&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Resolved with changeset 93502.</description><author>Yao</author><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 06:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: TFS Integration Pack - Check In Object incorrect input mapping [18288] 20120804061600A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: TFS Integration Pack - Check In Object incorrect input mapping [18288]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18288</link><description>Hey Yao,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It looks like your check in object isn&amp;#39;t mapping quite correctly to your versioncontrolhelper class.  In the object you are doing &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;vcHelper.Checkin&amp;#40;workspacePath, localPath, comment, recursion&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;but the constructor is&lt;br /&gt;public void Checkin&amp;#40;&lt;br /&gt;            string workspacePath,&lt;br /&gt;            string localFilePath,&lt;br /&gt;            string recursion,&lt;br /&gt;            string comment&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>randorfer</author><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:21:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: TFS Integration Pack - Check In Object incorrect input mapping [18288] 20120628032127P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Creating list item with Username and Password field [18274]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18274</link><description>Unable to add list items to sharepoint list containing fields named username or password. Upon investigation of the server security logs, it appears that the field username writes over the connection username.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>mpocock</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:41:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Creating list item with Username and Password field [18274] 20120625064115P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: never mind, different orchestrator team ;-) [18138]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18138</link><description>not related sorry&amp;#47;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rhearn</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:41:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: never mind, different orchestrator team ;-) [18138] 20120613054121P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Create Security group activity does not return ldap path [18138]</title><link>http://orchestrator.codeplex.com/workitem/18138</link><description>In the Active Directory pack 2.8, the create security group does not return any ldappath of the created object. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;resolution&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt; group.CommitChanges&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt; response.Publish&amp;#40;&amp;#34;Group LDAP Path&amp;#34;, groupDn&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The name of the output string is incorrect and placed at the wrong location.&lt;br /&gt;The Response string should come after the group.commitchanges and the name of the response should be &amp;#34;Group LDAP Path&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;regards&lt;br /&gt;jack&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Jackl</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 17:06:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Create Security group activity does not return ldap path [18138] 20120527050607P</guid></item></channel></rss>